San José State University 

appletmagic.com Thayer Watkins Silicon Valley & Tornado Alley USA 



Only five months after the publication of Belinfante's proof of the SpinStatistics Theorem based upon his Ph.D. dissertation Pauli wrote a critique of it. Ian Duck and E.C.G. Sudarshan in their Pauli and the SpinStatistics Theorem say that the criticisms where not justified. Pauli brought Belinfante in as a coauthor of the critique article. Duck and Sudarshan suggest that Belinfante was a lessthaneager participant to that critique of his own work. Pauli, at that time, was perhaps past his prime as a theorist.
The critique was stated in terms of the undor concept introduced by Belinfante. Pauli seems intrigued by the assumption that the systems are invariant to charge conjugation, the reassignment of charge to the particles of an assembleage. Pauli wanted to combine invariance with charge conjugation with the positive definiteness of energy.
Duck and Sudarshan say
What then about the validity of the criticisms of Belifante's proof? The conclusion is that Belifante's proof is not correct, but not for the reasons put forth by Pauli. Pauli's objections appear to us today to be contrived and artificial.
(To be continued,)
Ian Duck and E.C.G. Sudarshan, Pauli and the SpinStatistics Theorem,, World Scientific, Singapore, 1997.
HOME PAGE OF Thayer Watkins 